معا من أجل الفصل بين مدارس الذكور والإناث لزيادة التحصيل العلمي في مجتمعنا الليبي
July 28, 2012
معا من أجل الفصل بين مدارس الذكور والإناث لزيادة التحصيل العلمي في مجتمعنا الليبي
.
.
الولايات المتحدة قطعة شوطا طويلا في مجال فصل مدارس الذكور عن الإناث
وهناك الكثير من الأبحاث والدراسات التي أجرية في هذا المضمار - بريطانيا
أيضا لديه الكثير من المدارس التي نهجت نفس المنوال ، وأعداد تلك المدارس
في إزدياد مضطرد - هذا الغرب الذي يلهث ورائه قصار العقول - لماذا لا
يأخذوها من قصيرها ويجنون الثمار أم إن الثمار
التي يجنونها نتنة نتانة عقولهم - هل لأن هناك عقول مغيبة في مجتمعنا
الليبي وأريد للعقول النتنة قيادة المرحلة و جرنا إلى الهاوية - سؤال يحتاج
إلى طرح والإجابة لا تستوجب أن تكون من منطلق إسلامي بل من منطلق أكاديمي
بحث ، حتى يفهم أصحاب العقول الخاملة وتدخل أدمغهم النتنة.
طبعا شرعنا الكريم حث على فصل الذكور على الإناث في الحديث ، فقد روى أبو داود في سننه عن عمرو بن شعيب عن أبيه عن جده قال: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: مروا أولادكم بالصلاة وهم أبناء سبع سنين، واضربوهم عليها وهم أبناء عشر، وفرقوا بينهم في المضاجع. وقال الألباني: حسن صحيح - طبعا هذه المراجع بالنسبة للذين ينتسبون للإسلام من ليبراليين وعلمانيين فإنه ينطبق عليه القول "وين وذنك يا جحي"ـ.
بعضا من المراجع والأبحاث الأمريكية (فرنجة ، علوج ..... إلخ سميهم ما شئت ) حول فصل مدارس الذكور عن الإناث وآثارها الإيجابية في التحصيل العلمي.
الكتب والمراجع لأصحاب العقول النيرة :
كتاب الله وسنة رسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم
الكتب والمراجع لأصحاب العقول الخاملة والنتنة:
طبعا شرعنا الكريم حث على فصل الذكور على الإناث في الحديث ، فقد روى أبو داود في سننه عن عمرو بن شعيب عن أبيه عن جده قال: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: مروا أولادكم بالصلاة وهم أبناء سبع سنين، واضربوهم عليها وهم أبناء عشر، وفرقوا بينهم في المضاجع. وقال الألباني: حسن صحيح - طبعا هذه المراجع بالنسبة للذين ينتسبون للإسلام من ليبراليين وعلمانيين فإنه ينطبق عليه القول "وين وذنك يا جحي"ـ.
بعضا من المراجع والأبحاث الأمريكية (فرنجة ، علوج ..... إلخ سميهم ما شئت ) حول فصل مدارس الذكور عن الإناث وآثارها الإيجابية في التحصيل العلمي.
الكتب والمراجع لأصحاب العقول النيرة :
كتاب الله وسنة رسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم
الكتب والمراجع لأصحاب العقول الخاملة والنتنة:
Able, G. (2000). British A-level results and single-sex education. International Boys’
Schools Coalition Bulletin2(2) (manuscript fromauthor).
Ainley, J. and Daly, P. (2002). Participation inscience course in the final year of high
school in Australia: the influences of single-sex and co-educational schools. In:
Datnow, A. and Hubbard, L. (Eds.). Gender in Policy and Practice: Perspectives on
Single-Sex and Co-educational Schooling. London: RoutledgeFalmer, pp 243-262.
Arnot, M., Gray, J., James, M. and Ruddock, J. with Duveen, G. (1998). Recent Research
on Gender and Educational Performance. London: The Stationery Office (for
Ofsted).
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (1998) Separated by
Sex: A Critical Look at Single-Sex Education for Girls. Washington, DC: AAUWF.
Baker, D.B., Riordan, C. and Schaub, M. (1995). The effects of sex-grouped schooling on
achievement; the role of national context. Comparative Education Review, 39, 468-482.
Barton, A. (2002) Teaching modern foreign languages to single-sex-classes. Language
Learning Journal, no 25, 8-14.
Blau, J.R and Goodman, N (1991) (Editors). Social Roles and Social Institutions: Essays
in Honor of Rose Laub Coser. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.
Bone, A. (1983). Girls and Girls-Only Schools. Manchester: Equal Opportunities
Commission.
Brember, I. (2006). Personal communication, 20 July 2006.
Bridgett, S. (2006). Sexismin science. Letter. The Independent Education and Careers,
13 July 2006, p 2.
Brutsaert, H. (2001). Cited in Brutsaert, H.and Van Houtte, M. (2002). Girls’ and boys’
sense of belonging in single-sex versus co-educational schools. Research in
Education, no 68, 48-56.
Brutsaert, H. and Bracke, P (1994). Gender context in elementary school. Educational
Studies, 20, 3-10.
Brutsaert, H. and Van Houtte, M. (2002). Girls’ and boys’ sense of belonging in single-sex versus co-educational schools. Research in Education, no 68, 48-56.
Bynner, J. and Joshi, H. (2002). Equality and opportunity in education; the evidence from
1958 and the 1970 birth cohort surveys. Oxford Review of Education, 28, 405-425.
Carpenter, P. and Hayden, M. (1987). Girls’ academic achievements: single-sex versus co-educational schools in Australia. Sociology of Education, 60, 156-67.
32
Caspi, A. (1995). Puberty and the gender organisation of schools: how biology and social
context shape the adolescent experience. In: Crockett, L.J. and Crouter, A.C. (Eds.)
Pathways Through Adolescence: Individual Development in Relation to Social
Contexts, Mahwah, N.J: Erlbaum,pp 57-74.
Cipriani-Sklar, R. (1996). A quantitative and qualitative examination of the influence of
the normative and perceived school environments of a co-education public school vs
a single-sex Catholic school on ninth grade science self-concept of high school girls.
Cited in Mael, F. et al(2005). Single-Sex Versus Co-educational Schooling: A
Systematic Review. U. S. Department of Education Office of Planning Evaluation
and Policy Development Doc # 2005-01.
Colley, A, Comber, C. and Hargreaves, D. (1994). School subject preferences of pupils in
single-sex and co-educational secondary schools. Educational Studies, 20, 379--385.
Crump, S.J. (1990). Gender and curriculum;power and being female. British Journal of
Sociology of Education, 11, 289-306.
Cuddy, A.R. (2000). The development of self-concept in adolescent girls attending single-sex and co-educational schools. Cited in Mael, F. et al(2005). Single-Sex Versus
Co-educational Schooling: A Systematic Review. U. S. Department of Education
Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development Doc # 2005-01.
Dale, R.R. (1969, 1971, 1974). Mixed or Single-Sex School?Volumes I-III. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Daley, J. (1995).The Times23 August.
Daly, P. (1995). Science course participation and science course achievement in single-sex
and co-educational schools. Evaluation and Research in Education, 9, 91-98.
Daly, P. (1996). The effects of single-sex and co-educational secondary schooling in girls’
achievement. Research Papers in Education, 11, 289-306.
Daly, P. and Defty, N. (2001). A longitudinal study of secondary school students’
attitudes to school life: gender and school gender influences. Third International,
Inter-Disciplinary Evidence-Based Policies and Indicator Systems Conference,
Durham, July 2001, Durham: CEM Centre, http://cem.dur.ac.uk/.
Daly, P. and Defty, N. (2004). Extension of single-sex public school provision: evidential
concerns. Evaluation and Research in Education, 18, 129-136.
Daly, P. and Shuttleworth, I. (1996). Determinants of public examination entry and
attainment in mathematics: evidence on gender and gender-type of school fromthe
1980s and 1990s in Northern Ireland. Evaluation and Research in Education, 10,
1-11.
Datnow, A. and Hubbard, L. (Eds.) (2002). Gender in Policy and Practice: Perspectives
on Single-Sex and Co-educational Schooling. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
33
Dean, C. (1998). Inspectors say girls’ schools are the best. Association of Maintained
Girls’ Schools Conference. Times Educational Supplement, 9 October, 1998.
Despontin, B. (2006a). The best route to girl power. The vogue for co-ed schools does
girls few favours. They flourish in a single-sex environment. The Daily Telegraph
Special Broadsheet, 11 March 2006.
Despontin, B. (2006b). Single-sex education is the way forward. Letter fromthe President
of the Girls’ Schools Association. The Observer, 2 July 2006,
DfES (2004). Statistics of Education. Schools in England 2004 Edition.London: The
Stationery Office.
Elwood, J. and Gipps, C. (1999). Review of Recent Research on the Achievement of Girls
in Single-Sex Schools. London: Institute of Education.
Foskett, N.H. and Hemsley-Brown, J.V (2001). Choosing Futures: Young People’s
Decision-Making in Education, Training and Careers Markets. London:
RoutledgeFalmer.
Frost, S. et al(2005). Count mein! Gender and minority ethnic attainment in school
science. School Science Review, 816, 105-112.
Gill, J. (2004). Beyond the Great Divide: Single-sex or Co-education. Sydney: University
of New South Wales Press.
Gillibrand, E., Robinson, P., Brawn, R. and Osborn, A. (1999). Girls’ participation in
physics in single-sex classes in mixed schools in relation to confidence and
achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 349-362.
Gipps, C. (2006). Personal communication, 10 July 2006.
Girls’ Schools Association (2006). Girls at independent girls-only schools are top of the
league in 2005 A-levels. Press Release, 20 February 2006.
Gorard, S. and Smith, E. (2004). What is ‘underachievement’ at school? School
Leadership and Management, 24, 205-225.
Gray, J. Peng, W-J., Steward, S. and Thomas, S. (2004). Towards a typology of gender-related school effects: somenew perspectives on a familiar problem. Oxford Review
of Education, 30, 529-550.
Gurian, M. (1997). The Wonder of Boys. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
Gurian, M. (2002). The Wonder of Girls. New York: Atria.
Gurian, M. and Stevens, K. (2005). The Minds of Boys. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/John
Wiley.
34
Hamilton, M. (1985). Performance levels in science and other subjects for Jamaican
adolescents attending single-sex and co-educational high schools. International
Science Education, 69, 535-547.
Hannan, D.F., Smyth, E., McCullagh, J., O’Leary, R. and McMahon, D. (1996). Co-Education and Gender Equality: Examination Performance, Stress, and Personal
Development. Dublin: Oak Tree.
Harker, R. (2000). Achievement, gender and the single-sex/coed debate. British Journal of
the Sociology of Education, 21, 203-218.
Harris, M.B. (1986). Co-education and sex roles. Australian Journal of Education, 30,
117-131.
Heim, A. (1970). Intelligence and Personality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Henry, J. (2001). Help for the boys helps the girls. Times Educational Supplement, 1 June
2001.
Jackson, C. (2002) Can single-sex classes inco-educational schools enhance the learning
experiences of girls and/or boys? Anexploration of pupils’ perceptions. British
Educational Research Journal, 28, 37-48.
Jackson, C. and Bisset, M. (2005). Gender and school choice: factors influencing parents
when choosing single-sex or co-educational independent schools for their children.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 195-211.
Joint Council for Qualifications (2005). National Provisional GCE A Level Results – June
2005 (All UK Candidates).
Joint Council for Qualifications (2005) National Provisional GCSE (Full Course) Results
– June 2005 (All UK Candidates).
Lambert, J. (1998). An investigation of the difference in multidimensional self-concept
between adolescent girls in single-sex and co-educational school settings. Cited in
Mael, F. et al(2005). Single-Sex Versus Co-educational Schooling: A Systematic
Review. U. S. Department of Education Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy
Development Doc # 2005-01.
Lunnon, J. (2006). Samantha and Goliath. Times Educational Supplement, 14 July 2006.
Lee, V.E. (1998). Is single-sex secondary schooling a solution to the problemof gender
inequity? In American Association of University Women Educational Foundation
Separated by Sex: A Critical Look at Single-Sex Education for Girls, Washington,
DC: AAUWF, pp 41-52.
Lee, V.E. and Bryk, A.S. (1986). Effects of single-sex secondary schools on student
achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 381-395.
35
Lee, V.E. and Lockheed, M.E. (1990). The effect of single-sex schooling on achievement
and attitudes in Nigeria. Comparative Education Review, 34, 209-231.
Lightfoot, L. (2004). Girls more likely to study science in single-sex schools. The Daily
Telegraph, 16 November 2004.
Mael, F., Alonso, A., Gibson, D., Rogers, K., and Smith, M. (2005). Single-Sex Versus
Co-educational Schooling: A Systematic Review. U. S. Department of Education
Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development Doc # 2005-01.
Maccoby, E.E. and Jacklin, C.N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Oxford:
University Press.
Marsh, H.W. (1989). Effects of attending single-sex and co-educational high schools on
achievement, attitudes, behaviours and sex differences. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 81, 70-85.
Marsh, H.W. (1991). Public, Catholic single-sex, and Catholic coeducation high schools:
their effect on achievement, affect and behaviours. American Journal of Education,
99, 320-356.
Marsh, H.W., Owens, L., Myers, M.R. and Smith, I.D. (1989). The transition fromsingle-sex to co-educational high schools: teacher perceptions, academic achievement, and
self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 155-173.
Marsh, H.W. and Rowe, K.J. (1996). The effects of single-sex and mixed-sex mathematics
classes within a co-educational school: a reanalysis and a comment. Australian
Journal of Education, 40, 147-162.
Marsh, H.W., Smith, I.D., Marsh, M. and Owens, L. (1988). The transition fromsingle-sex to co-educational high schools: effects on multiple dimensions of self-concept
and on academic achievement. American Journal of Education, 25, 237-269.
McCallum,I. and Demie, F. (2001). Social class, ethnicity and educational performance.
Educational Review, 43, 147-159.
McEwen, A., Knipe, D. and Gallagher, T. (1997). The impact of single-sex and co-educational schooling on participation and achievement in science; a 10-year
perspective. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15, 223-233.
Mullins, A. (2005). Single-Sex Schooling. MercatorNet
http://
Myhill, D. (2002) Bad boys and good girls? Patterns of interactions and response in
whole class teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 339-352.
National Association for Single Sex Public Education (2006). Single-Sex vs. Co-ed: The
Evidence. www.singlesexschools.org/
36
National Coalition of Girls’ Schools (1998). Girls’ schools offer valuable lessons for
educational reform. Press Release,11 March 1998.
Nicholson, T.W. (2005). A Research Paper Related to the Impact of Single-Sex Education
on Males in Secondary Schools. Project submitted in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Education, D’Youville College,
8 July 2005.
OECD (2001). Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA 2000.
OECD (2004). Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003.
OFSTED (2006). Personal communications, 11 and 12 July, 2006.
O’Reilly, J. (2000). Mixed school hits new heights with single-sex classes. The Sunday
Times, 20 August 2000.
Parker, L.H. and Rennie, L.J. (2002). Teachers’ implementation of gender-inclusive
instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms. International
Journal of Science Education, 24, 881-897.
Perry, B (2006). Quoted in Tyre, P.The trouble with boys. Cover story. Newsweek, 30
January 2006.
Pustjens, H., Van de gaer, E., Van Damme, J. and Onghena, P. (2004). Effect of secondary
schools on academic choices and on success in higher education. School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 281-311.
Pyke, N. (2000). Blunkett plans single-sex classrooms. The Independent, 20 August, 2000.
Riordan, C. (1985). Public and Catholic schooling: the effects of gender context.
American Journal of Education, 93, 518-540.
Riordan, C. (1990). Short-termoutcomes of mixed- and single-sex schooling. In: Riordan,
C. Girls and Boys in School: Together or Separate? New York: Teachers College
Press, pp 82-113.
Riordan, C. (1994). Single-gender schools: outcomes for African and Hispanic Americans.
Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 10, 177-205.
Riordan, C. (1998). The future of single-sex schools. In: American Association of
University Women Educational Foundation. Separated by Sex: A Critical Look at
Single-Sex Education for Girls, Washington, DC: AAUWF, pp 53-62.
Riordan, C. (2002). What do we know about the effects of single-sex schools in the
private sector? Implications for public schools. In: Datnow, A. and Hubbard, L.
(Eds.). Gender in Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Single-Sex and Co-educational Schooling. London: RoutledgeFalmer, pp10-30.
Rivers, C. and Barnett, R.C. (2006). The myth of ‘the boy crisis’. The Washington Post,
9 April 2006.
37
Robinson, P. and Smithers, A. (1999). Should the sexes be separated for secondary
education – comparisons of single-sex and co-educational schools? Research Papers
in Education, 14, 23-49.
Robinson, W.P. and Gillibrand, E. (2004). Single-sex teaching and achievement in
science. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 659-675.
Rowe, K.J. (1988). The effects of class type on student achievement, confidence and
participation in mathematics. Australian Journal of Education, 32, 180-202.
Rowe, K.J. (2000). Celebrating coeducation? Certainly not for academic achievement! An
examination of the emergent research evidence. Second National Conference on Co-education, Orange, New South Wales.
Rowe, K.J. (2002). The importance of teacher quality. Issue Analysis, 22,28 February
2002.
Rowe, K.J. (2006). Personal communication, 11 July 2006.
Salomone, R.C. (2003). Same, Different, Equal: Rethinking Single-Sex Schooling. New
Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Salmons, P., Nuttall, D., Cuttance, P. and Thomas, S. (1994). Continuity of School Effects.
London: Institute of Education.
Sanders, E. (1992). Black inner-city males and the Milwaukee Public Schools Immersion
Program. Cited in Mael, F. et al(2005). Single-Sex Versus Co-educational
Schooling: A Systematic Review. U. S. Department of Education Office of Planning
Evaluation and Policy Development Doc # 2005-01.
Sax, L. (2005). Why Gender Matters. New York: Doubleday.
Schneider, F.W. and Coutts, L.M. (1982). The high school environment: a comparison of
co-educational and single-sex schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 898-906.
Smith, E. and Gorard, S. (2006). Pupils’ views on equity in schools. Compare, 36, 41-56.
Smith, I.D. (1996). Gender Differentiation: Gender Differences in Academic Achievement
and Self-Concept in Co-educational and Single-Sex Schools. Australian Research
Council Institutional Grants Scheme, Final Report.
Smithers, A. and Collings, J. (1981). Girls studying science in the sixth form. In: Kelly, A.
(Ed). The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education. Manchester: University Press.
Smithers, A. and Robinson, P. (1995). Co-education and Single-Sex Schooling. CEER:
Manchester University.
38
Smithers, A. and Robinson, P. (1997). Co-education and Single-Sex Schooling - Revisited.
Uxbridge: Brunel University.
Smithers, A. and Robinson, P. (2005). Physics in Schools and Colleges: Teacher
Deployment and Student Outcomes.Buckingham:The Carmichael Press.
Smithers, A. and Robinson, P. (2006). Physics in Schools and Universities: Patterns and
Policies in Physics Education.Buckingham:The Carmichael Press.
Smithers, A. and Tracey, L. (2003). Teacher Qualifications. London: The Sutton Trust.
Smithers, R. (2003). Boys shun A-level English. The Guardian,9 October 2003.
Spielhofer, T., Benton, T. and Schagen, S. (2004). A study of the effects of school size
and single-sex education in English schools. Research Papers in Education, 19,
133-159.
Spielhofer, T., O’Donnell, L., Benton, T., Schagen, S. and Schagen, I. (2002). The Impact
of School Size and Single-Sex Education on Performance. LGA Research Report 33.
Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Stables, A. (1990). Difference between pupils frommixed and single-sex schools in their
enjoyment of school subjects and attitudes to science and to school. Educational
Review, 42, 221-230.
Streitmatter, J.L. (1998). Single-sex classes:female physics students state their case.
School Science and Mathematics, 98, 369-75.
Streitmatter, J.L. (1999). For Girls Only: Making a Case for Single-Sex Schools. New
York: State University of New York Press.
Sukhnandan, L., Lee, B. and Kelleher, S. (2000). An Investigation into Gender
Differences in Achievement. Phase 2 School and Classroom Strategies. Slough:
NFER.
Times Educational Supplement (2000). Conflicting evidence over single-sex success.
TES, 25 August 2000.
Thomas, S., Pan, H. and Goldstein, H. (1994). Public Examination Results in Context:
Analysis of 1992 Examination Results. London: Institute of Education.
Thompson, T. and Ungerleider, C. (2004). Single-Sex Schooling: Final Report. The
Canadian Centre for Knowledge Mobilisation: The University of British Columbia.
Tsolidis, G. and Dobson, I.R. (2006). Single-sex schooling: is it simply a “class act”?
Gender and Education, 18, 213-228.
U.S. Department of Education (1993). Single-Sex Schooling, Volumes 1 and 2,
Washington DC: Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development.
39
Van de gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J.and De Munter, A..(2004). Effects of single-sex versus co-educational classes on gender differences in progress in language and
mathematics achievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 307-322.
Warrington, M. and Younger, M. (2003). ‘We decided to give it a twirl’: single-sex
teaching in English comprehensive schools. Gender and Education, 15, 339-350.
Weinman, J. (1998). NBC News Transcript, 13 March 1998. Cited in Salomone, R.C.
(2003). Same, Different, Equal: Rethinking Single-Sex Schooling. New Haven and
London: Yale University Press, p 205.
West, A. and Hunter, J. (1993). Parents’views on mixed and single-sex secondary
schools. British Educational Research Journal, 369-379.
West, A. and Varlaam, A. (1991). Choosing a secondary school: parents of junior school
children. Educational Research, 33, 22-30.
Wong, K.C., Lam,W.R and Ho, L. (2002). The effects of schooling on gender differences.
British Educational Research Journal, 28, 827-843.
Woodward, L.J., Fergusson, D.M., and Horwood, L.J. (1999). Effects of single-sex and
co-educational secondary schooling on children’s academic achievement. Australian
Journal of Education, 43, 142-156.
Yates, S.M. (2004). Aspirations, progress and perceptions of boys froma single-sex
school following the changeover to co-education. International Education Journal,
4, 167-176.
Younger, M. and Warrington, M. (2002). Single-sex teaching in a co-educational
comprehensive school in England: an evaluation based upon students’ performance
and classroominteractions. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 353-374.
Younger, M. and Warrington, M. with Gray, J., Ruddock, J., McLellan, R., Bearne, E.,
Kershner, R. and Bricheno, P. (2005). Raising Boys’ Achievement.Research Report
636, London: Department for Education and Skills.
Ainley, J. and Daly, P. (2002). Participation inscience course in the final year of high
school in Australia: the influences of single-sex and co-educational schools. In:
Datnow, A. and Hubbard, L. (Eds.). Gender in Policy and Practice: Perspectives on
Single-Sex and Co-educational Schooling. London: RoutledgeFalmer, pp 243-262.
Arnot, M., Gray, J., James, M. and Ruddock, J. with Duveen, G. (1998). Recent Research
on Gender and Educational Performance. London: The Stationery Office (for
Ofsted).
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (1998) Separated by
Sex: A Critical Look at Single-Sex Education for Girls. Washington, DC: AAUWF.
Baker, D.B., Riordan, C. and Schaub, M. (1995). The effects of sex-grouped schooling on
achievement; the role of national context. Comparative Education Review, 39, 468-482.
Barton, A. (2002) Teaching modern foreign languages to single-sex-classes. Language
Learning Journal, no 25, 8-14.
Blau, J.R and Goodman, N (1991) (Editors). Social Roles and Social Institutions: Essays
in Honor of Rose Laub Coser. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.
Bone, A. (1983). Girls and Girls-Only Schools. Manchester: Equal Opportunities
Commission.
Brember, I. (2006). Personal communication, 20 July 2006.
Bridgett, S. (2006). Sexismin science. Letter. The Independent Education and Careers,
13 July 2006, p 2.
Brutsaert, H. (2001). Cited in Brutsaert, H.and Van Houtte, M. (2002). Girls’ and boys’
sense of belonging in single-sex versus co-educational schools. Research in
Education, no 68, 48-56.
Brutsaert, H. and Bracke, P (1994). Gender context in elementary school. Educational
Studies, 20, 3-10.
Brutsaert, H. and Van Houtte, M. (2002). Girls’ and boys’ sense of belonging in single-sex versus co-educational schools. Research in Education, no 68, 48-56.
Bynner, J. and Joshi, H. (2002). Equality and opportunity in education; the evidence from
1958 and the 1970 birth cohort surveys. Oxford Review of Education, 28, 405-425.
Carpenter, P. and Hayden, M. (1987). Girls’ academic achievements: single-sex versus co-educational schools in Australia. Sociology of Education, 60, 156-67.
32
Caspi, A. (1995). Puberty and the gender organisation of schools: how biology and social
context shape the adolescent experience. In: Crockett, L.J. and Crouter, A.C. (Eds.)
Pathways Through Adolescence: Individual Development in Relation to Social
Contexts, Mahwah, N.J: Erlbaum,pp 57-74.
Cipriani-Sklar, R. (1996). A quantitative and qualitative examination of the influence of
the normative and perceived school environments of a co-education public school vs
a single-sex Catholic school on ninth grade science self-concept of high school girls.
Cited in Mael, F. et al(2005). Single-Sex Versus Co-educational Schooling: A
Systematic Review. U. S. Department of Education Office of Planning Evaluation
and Policy Development Doc # 2005-01.
Colley, A, Comber, C. and Hargreaves, D. (1994). School subject preferences of pupils in
single-sex and co-educational secondary schools. Educational Studies, 20, 379--385.
Crump, S.J. (1990). Gender and curriculum;power and being female. British Journal of
Sociology of Education, 11, 289-306.
Cuddy, A.R. (2000). The development of self-concept in adolescent girls attending single-sex and co-educational schools. Cited in Mael, F. et al(2005). Single-Sex Versus
Co-educational Schooling: A Systematic Review. U. S. Department of Education
Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development Doc # 2005-01.
Dale, R.R. (1969, 1971, 1974). Mixed or Single-Sex School?Volumes I-III. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Daley, J. (1995).The Times23 August.
Daly, P. (1995). Science course participation and science course achievement in single-sex
and co-educational schools. Evaluation and Research in Education, 9, 91-98.
Daly, P. (1996). The effects of single-sex and co-educational secondary schooling in girls’
achievement. Research Papers in Education, 11, 289-306.
Daly, P. and Defty, N. (2001). A longitudinal study of secondary school students’
attitudes to school life: gender and school gender influences. Third International,
Inter-Disciplinary Evidence-Based Policies and Indicator Systems Conference,
Durham, July 2001, Durham: CEM Centre, http://cem.dur.ac.uk/.
Daly, P. and Defty, N. (2004). Extension of single-sex public school provision: evidential
concerns. Evaluation and Research in Education, 18, 129-136.
Daly, P. and Shuttleworth, I. (1996). Determinants of public examination entry and
attainment in mathematics: evidence on gender and gender-type of school fromthe
1980s and 1990s in Northern Ireland. Evaluation and Research in Education, 10,
1-11.
Datnow, A. and Hubbard, L. (Eds.) (2002). Gender in Policy and Practice: Perspectives
on Single-Sex and Co-educational Schooling. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
33
Dean, C. (1998). Inspectors say girls’ schools are the best. Association of Maintained
Girls’ Schools Conference. Times Educational Supplement, 9 October, 1998.
Despontin, B. (2006a). The best route to girl power. The vogue for co-ed schools does
girls few favours. They flourish in a single-sex environment. The Daily Telegraph
Special Broadsheet, 11 March 2006.
Despontin, B. (2006b). Single-sex education is the way forward. Letter fromthe President
of the Girls’ Schools Association. The Observer, 2 July 2006,
DfES (2004). Statistics of Education. Schools in England 2004 Edition.London: The
Stationery Office.
Elwood, J. and Gipps, C. (1999). Review of Recent Research on the Achievement of Girls
in Single-Sex Schools. London: Institute of Education.
Foskett, N.H. and Hemsley-Brown, J.V (2001). Choosing Futures: Young People’s
Decision-Making in Education, Training and Careers Markets. London:
RoutledgeFalmer.
Frost, S. et al(2005). Count mein! Gender and minority ethnic attainment in school
science. School Science Review, 816, 105-112.
Gill, J. (2004). Beyond the Great Divide: Single-sex or Co-education. Sydney: University
of New South Wales Press.
Gillibrand, E., Robinson, P., Brawn, R. and Osborn, A. (1999). Girls’ participation in
physics in single-sex classes in mixed schools in relation to confidence and
achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 349-362.
Gipps, C. (2006). Personal communication, 10 July 2006.
Girls’ Schools Association (2006). Girls at independent girls-only schools are top of the
league in 2005 A-levels. Press Release, 20 February 2006.
Gorard, S. and Smith, E. (2004). What is ‘underachievement’ at school? School
Leadership and Management, 24, 205-225.
Gray, J. Peng, W-J., Steward, S. and Thomas, S. (2004). Towards a typology of gender-related school effects: somenew perspectives on a familiar problem. Oxford Review
of Education, 30, 529-550.
Gurian, M. (1997). The Wonder of Boys. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
Gurian, M. (2002). The Wonder of Girls. New York: Atria.
Gurian, M. and Stevens, K. (2005). The Minds of Boys. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/John
Wiley.
34
Hamilton, M. (1985). Performance levels in science and other subjects for Jamaican
adolescents attending single-sex and co-educational high schools. International
Science Education, 69, 535-547.
Hannan, D.F., Smyth, E., McCullagh, J., O’Leary, R. and McMahon, D. (1996). Co-Education and Gender Equality: Examination Performance, Stress, and Personal
Development. Dublin: Oak Tree.
Harker, R. (2000). Achievement, gender and the single-sex/coed debate. British Journal of
the Sociology of Education, 21, 203-218.
Harris, M.B. (1986). Co-education and sex roles. Australian Journal of Education, 30,
117-131.
Heim, A. (1970). Intelligence and Personality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Henry, J. (2001). Help for the boys helps the girls. Times Educational Supplement, 1 June
2001.
Jackson, C. (2002) Can single-sex classes inco-educational schools enhance the learning
experiences of girls and/or boys? Anexploration of pupils’ perceptions. British
Educational Research Journal, 28, 37-48.
Jackson, C. and Bisset, M. (2005). Gender and school choice: factors influencing parents
when choosing single-sex or co-educational independent schools for their children.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 195-211.
Joint Council for Qualifications (2005). National Provisional GCE A Level Results – June
2005 (All UK Candidates).
Joint Council for Qualifications (2005) National Provisional GCSE (Full Course) Results
– June 2005 (All UK Candidates).
Lambert, J. (1998). An investigation of the difference in multidimensional self-concept
between adolescent girls in single-sex and co-educational school settings. Cited in
Mael, F. et al(2005). Single-Sex Versus Co-educational Schooling: A Systematic
Review. U. S. Department of Education Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy
Development Doc # 2005-01.
Lunnon, J. (2006). Samantha and Goliath. Times Educational Supplement, 14 July 2006.
Lee, V.E. (1998). Is single-sex secondary schooling a solution to the problemof gender
inequity? In American Association of University Women Educational Foundation
Separated by Sex: A Critical Look at Single-Sex Education for Girls, Washington,
DC: AAUWF, pp 41-52.
Lee, V.E. and Bryk, A.S. (1986). Effects of single-sex secondary schools on student
achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 381-395.
35
Lee, V.E. and Lockheed, M.E. (1990). The effect of single-sex schooling on achievement
and attitudes in Nigeria. Comparative Education Review, 34, 209-231.
Lightfoot, L. (2004). Girls more likely to study science in single-sex schools. The Daily
Telegraph, 16 November 2004.
Mael, F., Alonso, A., Gibson, D., Rogers, K., and Smith, M. (2005). Single-Sex Versus
Co-educational Schooling: A Systematic Review. U. S. Department of Education
Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development Doc # 2005-01.
Maccoby, E.E. and Jacklin, C.N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Oxford:
University Press.
Marsh, H.W. (1989). Effects of attending single-sex and co-educational high schools on
achievement, attitudes, behaviours and sex differences. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 81, 70-85.
Marsh, H.W. (1991). Public, Catholic single-sex, and Catholic coeducation high schools:
their effect on achievement, affect and behaviours. American Journal of Education,
99, 320-356.
Marsh, H.W., Owens, L., Myers, M.R. and Smith, I.D. (1989). The transition fromsingle-sex to co-educational high schools: teacher perceptions, academic achievement, and
self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 155-173.
Marsh, H.W. and Rowe, K.J. (1996). The effects of single-sex and mixed-sex mathematics
classes within a co-educational school: a reanalysis and a comment. Australian
Journal of Education, 40, 147-162.
Marsh, H.W., Smith, I.D., Marsh, M. and Owens, L. (1988). The transition fromsingle-sex to co-educational high schools: effects on multiple dimensions of self-concept
and on academic achievement. American Journal of Education, 25, 237-269.
McCallum,I. and Demie, F. (2001). Social class, ethnicity and educational performance.
Educational Review, 43, 147-159.
McEwen, A., Knipe, D. and Gallagher, T. (1997). The impact of single-sex and co-educational schooling on participation and achievement in science; a 10-year
perspective. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15, 223-233.
Mullins, A. (2005). Single-Sex Schooling. MercatorNet
http://
Myhill, D. (2002) Bad boys and good girls? Patterns of interactions and response in
whole class teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 339-352.
National Association for Single Sex Public Education (2006). Single-Sex vs. Co-ed: The
Evidence. www.singlesexschools.org/
36
National Coalition of Girls’ Schools (1998). Girls’ schools offer valuable lessons for
educational reform. Press Release,11 March 1998.
Nicholson, T.W. (2005). A Research Paper Related to the Impact of Single-Sex Education
on Males in Secondary Schools. Project submitted in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Education, D’Youville College,
8 July 2005.
OECD (2001). Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA 2000.
OECD (2004). Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003.
OFSTED (2006). Personal communications, 11 and 12 July, 2006.
O’Reilly, J. (2000). Mixed school hits new heights with single-sex classes. The Sunday
Times, 20 August 2000.
Parker, L.H. and Rennie, L.J. (2002). Teachers’ implementation of gender-inclusive
instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms. International
Journal of Science Education, 24, 881-897.
Perry, B (2006). Quoted in Tyre, P.The trouble with boys. Cover story. Newsweek, 30
January 2006.
Pustjens, H., Van de gaer, E., Van Damme, J. and Onghena, P. (2004). Effect of secondary
schools on academic choices and on success in higher education. School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 281-311.
Pyke, N. (2000). Blunkett plans single-sex classrooms. The Independent, 20 August, 2000.
Riordan, C. (1985). Public and Catholic schooling: the effects of gender context.
American Journal of Education, 93, 518-540.
Riordan, C. (1990). Short-termoutcomes of mixed- and single-sex schooling. In: Riordan,
C. Girls and Boys in School: Together or Separate? New York: Teachers College
Press, pp 82-113.
Riordan, C. (1994). Single-gender schools: outcomes for African and Hispanic Americans.
Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 10, 177-205.
Riordan, C. (1998). The future of single-sex schools. In: American Association of
University Women Educational Foundation. Separated by Sex: A Critical Look at
Single-Sex Education for Girls, Washington, DC: AAUWF, pp 53-62.
Riordan, C. (2002). What do we know about the effects of single-sex schools in the
private sector? Implications for public schools. In: Datnow, A. and Hubbard, L.
(Eds.). Gender in Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Single-Sex and Co-educational Schooling. London: RoutledgeFalmer, pp10-30.
Rivers, C. and Barnett, R.C. (2006). The myth of ‘the boy crisis’. The Washington Post,
9 April 2006.
37
Robinson, P. and Smithers, A. (1999). Should the sexes be separated for secondary
education – comparisons of single-sex and co-educational schools? Research Papers
in Education, 14, 23-49.
Robinson, W.P. and Gillibrand, E. (2004). Single-sex teaching and achievement in
science. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 659-675.
Rowe, K.J. (1988). The effects of class type on student achievement, confidence and
participation in mathematics. Australian Journal of Education, 32, 180-202.
Rowe, K.J. (2000). Celebrating coeducation? Certainly not for academic achievement! An
examination of the emergent research evidence. Second National Conference on Co-education, Orange, New South Wales.
Rowe, K.J. (2002). The importance of teacher quality. Issue Analysis, 22,28 February
2002.
Rowe, K.J. (2006). Personal communication, 11 July 2006.
Salomone, R.C. (2003). Same, Different, Equal: Rethinking Single-Sex Schooling. New
Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Salmons, P., Nuttall, D., Cuttance, P. and Thomas, S. (1994). Continuity of School Effects.
London: Institute of Education.
Sanders, E. (1992). Black inner-city males and the Milwaukee Public Schools Immersion
Program. Cited in Mael, F. et al(2005). Single-Sex Versus Co-educational
Schooling: A Systematic Review. U. S. Department of Education Office of Planning
Evaluation and Policy Development Doc # 2005-01.
Sax, L. (2005). Why Gender Matters. New York: Doubleday.
Schneider, F.W. and Coutts, L.M. (1982). The high school environment: a comparison of
co-educational and single-sex schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 898-906.
Smith, E. and Gorard, S. (2006). Pupils’ views on equity in schools. Compare, 36, 41-56.
Smith, I.D. (1996). Gender Differentiation: Gender Differences in Academic Achievement
and Self-Concept in Co-educational and Single-Sex Schools. Australian Research
Council Institutional Grants Scheme, Final Report.
Smithers, A. and Collings, J. (1981). Girls studying science in the sixth form. In: Kelly, A.
(Ed). The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education. Manchester: University Press.
Smithers, A. and Robinson, P. (1995). Co-education and Single-Sex Schooling. CEER:
Manchester University.
38
Smithers, A. and Robinson, P. (1997). Co-education and Single-Sex Schooling - Revisited.
Uxbridge: Brunel University.
Smithers, A. and Robinson, P. (2005). Physics in Schools and Colleges: Teacher
Deployment and Student Outcomes.Buckingham:The Carmichael Press.
Smithers, A. and Robinson, P. (2006). Physics in Schools and Universities: Patterns and
Policies in Physics Education.Buckingham:The Carmichael Press.
Smithers, A. and Tracey, L. (2003). Teacher Qualifications. London: The Sutton Trust.
Smithers, R. (2003). Boys shun A-level English. The Guardian,9 October 2003.
Spielhofer, T., Benton, T. and Schagen, S. (2004). A study of the effects of school size
and single-sex education in English schools. Research Papers in Education, 19,
133-159.
Spielhofer, T., O’Donnell, L., Benton, T., Schagen, S. and Schagen, I. (2002). The Impact
of School Size and Single-Sex Education on Performance. LGA Research Report 33.
Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Stables, A. (1990). Difference between pupils frommixed and single-sex schools in their
enjoyment of school subjects and attitudes to science and to school. Educational
Review, 42, 221-230.
Streitmatter, J.L. (1998). Single-sex classes:female physics students state their case.
School Science and Mathematics, 98, 369-75.
Streitmatter, J.L. (1999). For Girls Only: Making a Case for Single-Sex Schools. New
York: State University of New York Press.
Sukhnandan, L., Lee, B. and Kelleher, S. (2000). An Investigation into Gender
Differences in Achievement. Phase 2 School and Classroom Strategies. Slough:
NFER.
Times Educational Supplement (2000). Conflicting evidence over single-sex success.
TES, 25 August 2000.
Thomas, S., Pan, H. and Goldstein, H. (1994). Public Examination Results in Context:
Analysis of 1992 Examination Results. London: Institute of Education.
Thompson, T. and Ungerleider, C. (2004). Single-Sex Schooling: Final Report. The
Canadian Centre for Knowledge Mobilisation: The University of British Columbia.
Tsolidis, G. and Dobson, I.R. (2006). Single-sex schooling: is it simply a “class act”?
Gender and Education, 18, 213-228.
U.S. Department of Education (1993). Single-Sex Schooling, Volumes 1 and 2,
Washington DC: Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development.
39
Van de gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J.and De Munter, A..(2004). Effects of single-sex versus co-educational classes on gender differences in progress in language and
mathematics achievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 307-322.
Warrington, M. and Younger, M. (2003). ‘We decided to give it a twirl’: single-sex
teaching in English comprehensive schools. Gender and Education, 15, 339-350.
Weinman, J. (1998). NBC News Transcript, 13 March 1998. Cited in Salomone, R.C.
(2003). Same, Different, Equal: Rethinking Single-Sex Schooling. New Haven and
London: Yale University Press, p 205.
West, A. and Hunter, J. (1993). Parents’views on mixed and single-sex secondary
schools. British Educational Research Journal, 369-379.
West, A. and Varlaam, A. (1991). Choosing a secondary school: parents of junior school
children. Educational Research, 33, 22-30.
Wong, K.C., Lam,W.R and Ho, L. (2002). The effects of schooling on gender differences.
British Educational Research Journal, 28, 827-843.
Woodward, L.J., Fergusson, D.M., and Horwood, L.J. (1999). Effects of single-sex and
co-educational secondary schooling on children’s academic achievement. Australian
Journal of Education, 43, 142-156.
Yates, S.M. (2004). Aspirations, progress and perceptions of boys froma single-sex
school following the changeover to co-education. International Education Journal,
4, 167-176.
Younger, M. and Warrington, M. (2002). Single-sex teaching in a co-educational
comprehensive school in England: an evaluation based upon students’ performance
and classroominteractions. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 353-374.
Younger, M. and Warrington, M. with Gray, J., Ruddock, J., McLellan, R., Bearne, E.,
Kershner, R. and Bricheno, P. (2005). Raising Boys’ Achievement.Research Report
636, London: Department for Education and Skills.
No comments:
Post a Comment